Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Muse Wonder (Max)
Meta
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Muse Wonder (Max) Meta	Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Anthropic
Intelligence	Best: 43.6	41.8
Coding	—	74.3
Agentic	—	41.9
Speed	152 t/s	—
TTFT	35.7 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$4×1.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $2.50
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$20×1.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $12.50
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	—
Cost / task	$6.95	—

Intelligence

Muse Wonder (Max): Best: 43.6
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 41.8

Coding

Muse Wonder (Max): —
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 74.3

Agentic

Muse Wonder (Max): —
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 41.9

Speed

Muse Wonder (Max): 152 t/s
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —

TTFT

Muse Wonder (Max): 35.7 s
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Muse Wonder (Max): $4×1.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): Best: $2.50

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Muse Wonder (Max): $20×1.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): Best: $12.50

Context window

Muse Wonder (Max): 1M
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): 1M

Reasoning

Muse Wonder (Max): Yes
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): Yes

Open weights

Muse Wonder (Max): No
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —

Cost / task

Muse Wonder (Max): $6.95
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Muse Wonder (Max)43.6 · $8
Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)41.8 · $5