Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Muse Glimmer 30B
Meta
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
StepFun
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Muse Glimmer 30B Meta | Step 3.5 Flash 2603 StepFun | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 17.5 | 17 | |
| Coding | 49 | — | |
| Agentic | 8.5 | — | |
| Speed | — | 142 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 3.33 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.10 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $1.20×4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.30 | |
| Context window | 131K | Best: 256K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- Best: 17.5
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 17
Coding
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- 49
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- —
Agentic
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- 8.5
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- —
Speed
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- —
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 142 t/s
TTFT
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- —
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 3.33 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Best: $0.10
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- $1.20×4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Best: $0.30
Context window
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- 131K
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Best: 256K
Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- Yes
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Yes
Open weights
- Muse Glimmer 30B
- Yes
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Muse Glimmer 30B17.5 · $0.525
- Step 3.5 Flash 260317 · $0.15