Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Muse Glimmer (High)
Meta
Step 3.5 Flash 2603
StepFun

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Muse Glimmer (High) Meta	Step 3.5 Flash 2603 StepFun
Intelligence	Best: 17.5	17
Coding	49	—
Agentic	8.5	—
Speed	124 t/s	Best: 142 t/s
TTFT	Best: 1.09 s	3.33 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.10
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$1.20×4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.30
Context window	131K	Best: 256K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	No
Cost / task	$0.0535	—

Intelligence

Muse Glimmer (High): Best: 17.5
Step 3.5 Flash 2603: 17

Coding

Muse Glimmer (High): 49
Step 3.5 Flash 2603: —

Agentic

Muse Glimmer (High): 8.5
Step 3.5 Flash 2603: —

Speed

Muse Glimmer (High): 124 t/s
Step 3.5 Flash 2603: Best: 142 t/s

TTFT

Muse Glimmer (High): Best: 1.09 s
Step 3.5 Flash 2603: 3.33 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Muse Glimmer (High): $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Step 3.5 Flash 2603: Best: $0.10

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Muse Glimmer (High): $1.20×4 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Step 3.5 Flash 2603: Best: $0.30

Context window

Muse Glimmer (High): 131K
Step 3.5 Flash 2603: Best: 256K

Reasoning

Muse Glimmer (High): Yes
Step 3.5 Flash 2603: Yes

Open weights

Muse Glimmer (High): Yes
Step 3.5 Flash 2603: No

Cost / task

Muse Glimmer (High): $0.0535
Step 3.5 Flash 2603: —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Muse Glimmer (High)17.5 · $0.525
Step 3.5 Flash 260317 · $0.15