Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
LG AI Research
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning) LG AI Research | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 6.3 | 6.3 | |
| Coding | 49 | — | |
| Math | — | 39.3 | |
| Agentic | 8.5 | — | |
| Speed | 120 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 1.17 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.30 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $1.20 | — | |
| Context window | 131K | 131K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | $0.161 | — |
Intelligence
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- 6.3
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- 6.3
Coding
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- 49
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Math
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- —
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- 39.3
Agentic
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- 8.5
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Speed
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- 120 t/s
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- —
TTFT
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- 1.17 s
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- $0.30
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- $1.20
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Context window
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- 131K
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- 131K
Reasoning
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- Yes
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- No
Open weights
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- Yes
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- Yes
Cost / task
- Muse Glimmer (High)
- $0.161
- EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning)
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Muse Glimmer (High)6.3 · $0.161
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: EXAONE 4.0 32B (Non-reasoning).