Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 4.8 | 4.8 | |
| Coding | 4.8 | — | |
| Math | — | 0 | |
| Agentic | 0.8 | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.10 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.10 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 131K | 32.8K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Ministral 3 3B 2512
- 4.8
- Granite 4.0 350M
- 4.8
Coding
- Ministral 3 3B 2512
- 4.8
- Granite 4.0 350M
- —
Math
- Ministral 3 3B 2512
- —
- Granite 4.0 350M
- 0
Agentic
- Ministral 3 3B 2512
- 0.8
- Granite 4.0 350M
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Ministral 3 3B 2512
- $0.10
- Granite 4.0 350M
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Ministral 3 3B 2512
- $0.10
- Granite 4.0 350M
- —
Context window
- Ministral 3 3B 2512
- Best: 131K
- Granite 4.0 350M
- 32.8K
Reasoning
- Ministral 3 3B 2512
- No
- Granite 4.0 350M
- No
Open weights
- Ministral 3 3B 2512
- Yes
- Granite 4.0 350M
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Ministral 3 3B 25124.8 · $0.10
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Granite 4.0 350M.