Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

MiniMax-M2.7
MiniMax
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax	Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic
Intelligence	22.8	22.8
Coding	52.6	—
Agentic	15.3	—
Speed	49.6 t/s	—
TTFT	1.74 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.30	$15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $1.20	$75×62.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	No
Open weights	Yes	No
Cost / task	$0.106	—

Intelligence

MiniMax-M2.7: 22.8
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): 22.8

Coding

MiniMax-M2.7: 52.6
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Agentic

MiniMax-M2.7: 15.3
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Speed

MiniMax-M2.7: 49.6 t/s
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

TTFT

MiniMax-M2.7: 1.74 s
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

MiniMax-M2.7: Best: $0.30
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): $15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

MiniMax-M2.7: Best: $1.20
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): $75×62.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

MiniMax-M2.7: 1M
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): 1M

Reasoning

MiniMax-M2.7: Yes
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): No

Open weights

MiniMax-M2.7: Yes
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): No

Cost / task

MiniMax-M2.7: $0.106
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

MiniMax-M2.722.8 · $0.525
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)22.8 · $30