Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- MiniMax-M2
MiniMax
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | MiniMax-M2 MiniMax | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 18.6 | 18.6 | |
| Math | 78.3 | — | |
| Speed | 65.8 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 1.46 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.30 | $15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $1.20 | $75×62.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | Best: 205K | 200K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
Intelligence
- MiniMax-M2
- 18.6
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 18.6
Math
- MiniMax-M2
- 78.3
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
Speed
- MiniMax-M2
- 65.8 t/s
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
TTFT
- MiniMax-M2
- 1.46 s
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- MiniMax-M2
- Best: $0.30
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $15×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- MiniMax-M2
- Best: $1.20
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $75×62.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- MiniMax-M2
- Best: 205K
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 200K
Reasoning
- MiniMax-M2
- Yes
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Open weights
- MiniMax-M2
- Yes
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- MiniMax-M218.6 · $0.525
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)18.6 · $30