Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 18.3 | Best: 18.6 | |
| Speed | 32.4 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 2.08 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.435 | $15×34.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.87 | $75×86.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 200K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
Intelligence
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
- 18.3
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 18.6
Speed
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
- 32.4 t/s
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
TTFT
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
- 2.08 s
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
- Best: $0.435
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $15×34.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
- Best: $0.87
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $75×86.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 1M
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 200K
Reasoning
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
- No
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Open weights
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)
- Yes
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Non-reasoning)18.3 · $0.544
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)18.6 · $30