Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
Xiaomi
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Google
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026) Xiaomi | Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 22.4 | 22.2 | |
| Coding | — | 49.3 | |
| Agentic | — | 14.3 | |
| Speed | — | 435 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 7.25 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.30 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $2.50 | |
| Context window | 256K | Best: 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | No | |
| Cost / task | — | $0.193 |
Intelligence
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Best: 22.4
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 22.2
Coding
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 49.3
Agentic
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 14.3
Speed
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 435 t/s
TTFT
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- 7.25 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- $2.50
Context window
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- 256K
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- Best: 1M
Reasoning
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Yes
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- Yes
Open weights
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- Yes
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- No
Cost / task
- MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026)
- —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
- $0.193
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite22.2 · $0.193
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: MiMo-V2-Flash (Feb 2026).