Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Mercury 2
Inception
Trinity Large Thinking
Arcee AI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Mercury 2 Inception	Trinity Large Thinking Arcee AI
Intelligence	10.8	10.8
Coding	Best: 31.1	25.8
Agentic	Best: 1.6	1
Speed	Best: 460 t/s	346 t/s
TTFT	6.17 s	Best: 1.1 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.25	$0.25
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.75	$0.80×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	128K	Best: 512K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes
Cost / task	Best: $0.0386	$0.119×3.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Intelligence

Mercury 2: 10.8
Trinity Large Thinking: 10.8

Coding

Mercury 2: Best: 31.1
Trinity Large Thinking: 25.8

Agentic

Mercury 2: Best: 1.6
Trinity Large Thinking: 1

Speed

Mercury 2: Best: 460 t/s
Trinity Large Thinking: 346 t/s

TTFT

Mercury 2: 6.17 s
Trinity Large Thinking: Best: 1.1 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Mercury 2: $0.25
Trinity Large Thinking: $0.25

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Mercury 2: Best: $0.75
Trinity Large Thinking: $0.80×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Mercury 2: 128K
Trinity Large Thinking: Best: 512K

Reasoning

Mercury 2: Yes
Trinity Large Thinking: Yes

Open weights

Mercury 2: No
Trinity Large Thinking: Yes

Cost / task

Mercury 2: Best: $0.0386
Trinity Large Thinking: $0.119×3.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Mercury 210.8 · $0.0386
Trinity Large Thinking10.8 · $0.119