Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Mercury 2
Inception
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
Korea Telecom
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Mercury 2 Inception | Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro Korea Telecom | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 10.8 | Best: 11 | |
| Coding | 31.1 | — | |
| Math | — | 76.7 | |
| Agentic | 1.6 | — | |
| Speed | 460 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 6.17 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.25 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.75 | — | |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | No | |
| Cost / task | $0.0386 | — |
Intelligence
- Mercury 2
- 10.8
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- Best: 11
Coding
- Mercury 2
- 31.1
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- —
Math
- Mercury 2
- —
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- 76.7
Agentic
- Mercury 2
- 1.6
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- —
Speed
- Mercury 2
- 460 t/s
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- —
TTFT
- Mercury 2
- 6.17 s
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Mercury 2
- $0.25
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Mercury 2
- $0.75
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- —
Context window
- Mercury 2
- 128K
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- 128K
Reasoning
- Mercury 2
- Yes
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- Yes
Open weights
- Mercury 2
- No
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- No
Cost / task
- Mercury 2
- $0.0386
- Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Mercury 210.8 · $0.0386
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Mi:dm K 2.5 Pro.