Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Magistral Small 1.2
Mistral
- Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Magistral Small 1.2 Mistral | Claude 3 Opus Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 8.6 | Best: 8.7 | |
| Coding | 14.7 | Best: 19.5 | |
| Math | 80.3 | — | |
| Speed | 74.2 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 1.54 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.50 | $15×30 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $1.50 | $75×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 128K | Best: 200K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
Intelligence
- Magistral Small 1.2
- 8.6
- Claude 3 Opus
- Best: 8.7
Coding
- Magistral Small 1.2
- 14.7
- Claude 3 Opus
- Best: 19.5
Math
- Magistral Small 1.2
- 80.3
- Claude 3 Opus
- —
Speed
- Magistral Small 1.2
- 74.2 t/s
- Claude 3 Opus
- —
TTFT
- Magistral Small 1.2
- 1.54 s
- Claude 3 Opus
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Magistral Small 1.2
- Best: $0.50
- Claude 3 Opus
- $15×30 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Magistral Small 1.2
- Best: $1.50
- Claude 3 Opus
- $75×50 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- Magistral Small 1.2
- 128K
- Claude 3 Opus
- Best: 200K
Reasoning
- Magistral Small 1.2
- Yes
- Claude 3 Opus
- No
Open weights
- Magistral Small 1.2
- Yes
- Claude 3 Opus
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Magistral Small 1.28.6 · $0.75
- Claude 3 Opus8.7 · $30