Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- LongCat 2.0
LongCat
- JT-35B-Flash
China Mobile
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | LongCat 2.0 LongCat | JT-35B-Flash China Mobile | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 19.1 | 18.7 | |
| Coding | 45.3 | — | |
| Agentic | 14 | — | |
| Speed | 69.2 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 2.64 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.75 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $2.95 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 256K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No | |
| Cost / task | $0.146 | — |
Intelligence
- LongCat 2.0
- Best: 19.1
- JT-35B-Flash
- 18.7
Coding
- LongCat 2.0
- 45.3
- JT-35B-Flash
- —
Agentic
- LongCat 2.0
- 14
- JT-35B-Flash
- —
Speed
- LongCat 2.0
- 69.2 t/s
- JT-35B-Flash
- —
TTFT
- LongCat 2.0
- 2.64 s
- JT-35B-Flash
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- LongCat 2.0
- $0.75
- JT-35B-Flash
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- LongCat 2.0
- $2.95
- JT-35B-Flash
- —
Context window
- LongCat 2.0
- Best: 1M
- JT-35B-Flash
- 256K
Reasoning
- LongCat 2.0
- Yes
- JT-35B-Flash
- No
Open weights
- LongCat 2.0
- Yes
- JT-35B-Flash
- No
Cost / task
- LongCat 2.0
- $0.146
- JT-35B-Flash
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- LongCat 2.019.1 · $0.146
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: JT-35B-Flash.