Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 7.7 | 7.7 | |
| Coding | 11.9 | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.59×1.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.36 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.79×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.40 | |
| Context window | Best: 131K | 32.8K | |
| Reasoning | No | — | |
| Open weights | No | Yes |
Intelligence
- Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- 7.7
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- 7.7
Coding
- Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- 11.9
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- $0.59×1.6 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- Best: $0.36
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- $0.79×2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- Best: $0.40
Context window
- Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- Best: 131K
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- 32.8K
Reasoning
- Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- No
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- —
Open weights
- Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- No
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct7.7 · $0.64
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct7.7 · $0.37