Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Add a model · 2/4 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 4.8 | 4.8 | |
| Speed | — | 153 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 2.82 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.027 | $0.10×3.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.201 | Best: $0.20 | |
| Context window | 60K | Best: 65.5K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
- 4.8
- Apertus 8B Instruct
- 4.8
Speed
- Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
- —
- Apertus 8B Instruct
- 153 t/s
TTFT
- Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
- —
- Apertus 8B Instruct
- 2.82 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
- Best: $0.027
- Apertus 8B Instruct
- $0.10×3.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
- $0.201
- Apertus 8B Instruct
- Best: $0.20
Context window
- Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
- 60K
- Apertus 8B Instruct
- Best: 65.5K
Reasoning
- Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
- No
- Apertus 8B Instruct
- No
Open weights
- Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
- Yes
- Apertus 8B Instruct
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Meta: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct4.8 · $0.0705
- Apertus 8B Instruct4.8 · $0.125