Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B
Meta
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B Meta	Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct Meta
Intelligence	7.7	7.7
Coding	11.9	11.9
Math	7.7	—
Speed	92.8 t/s	—
TTFT	1.71 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.71×1.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.59
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.72	$0.79×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	128K	Best: 131K
Reasoning	No	No
Open weights	Yes	Yes

Intelligence

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B: 7.7
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 7.7

Coding

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B: 11.9
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 11.9

Math

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B: 7.7
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: —

Speed

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B: 92.8 t/s
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: —

TTFT

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B: 1.71 s
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B: $0.71×1.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Best: $0.59

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B: Best: $0.72
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: $0.79×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B: 128K
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Best: 131K

Reasoning

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B: No
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: No

Open weights

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B: Yes
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B7.7 · $0.712
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct7.7 · $0.64