Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
Alibaba
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B Alibaba | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 6.9 | 6.9 | |
| Math | 11 | — | |
| Speed | 33.9 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 10.8 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $1.20 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $1.20 | — | |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
- 6.9
- Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
- 6.9
Math
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
- 11
- Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
- —
Speed
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
- 33.9 t/s
- Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
- —
TTFT
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
- 10.8 s
- Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
- $1.20
- Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
- $1.20
- Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
- —
Context window
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
- 128K
- Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
- 128K
Reasoning
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
- No
- Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
- No
Open weights
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
- Yes
- Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B6.9 · $1.20
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Qwen2.5 Instruct 32B.