Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B
NVIDIA
Command A
Cohere

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B NVIDIA	Command A Cohere
Intelligence	6.9	Best: 7
Coding	—	27.8
Math	11	Best: 13
Agentic	—	1
Speed	33.9 t/s	Best: 61.5 t/s
TTFT	10.8 s	Best: 1.7 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $1.20	$2.50×2.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $1.20	$10×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	128K	Best: 256K
Reasoning	No	No
Open weights	Yes	Yes

Intelligence

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B: 6.9
Command A: Best: 7

Coding

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B: —
Command A: 27.8

Math

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B: 11
Command A: Best: 13

Agentic

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B: —
Command A: 1

Speed

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B: 33.9 t/s
Command A: Best: 61.5 t/s

TTFT

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B: 10.8 s
Command A: Best: 1.7 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B: Best: $1.20
Command A: $2.50×2.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B: Best: $1.20
Command A: $10×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B: 128K
Command A: Best: 256K

Reasoning

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B: No
Command A: No

Open weights

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B: Yes
Command A: Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Instruct 70B6.9 · $1.20
Command A7 · $4.38