Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling-mini-2.0
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling-mini-2.0 InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 5.5 | 5.5 | |
| Math | 49.3 | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.65 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $2.75 | |
| Context window | Best: 131K | 8K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Ling-mini-2.0
- 5.5
- Llama 3 Instruct 70B
- 5.5
Math
- Ling-mini-2.0
- 49.3
- Llama 3 Instruct 70B
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
- Llama 3 Instruct 70B
- $0.65
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
- Llama 3 Instruct 70B
- $2.75
Context window
- Ling-mini-2.0
- Best: 131K
- Llama 3 Instruct 70B
- 8K
Reasoning
- Ling-mini-2.0
- No
- Llama 3 Instruct 70B
- No
Open weights
- Ling-mini-2.0
- Yes
- Llama 3 Instruct 70B
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Llama 3 Instruct 70B5.5 · $1.18
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Ling-mini-2.0.