Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling-mini-2.0
InclusionAI
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling-mini-2.0 InclusionAI | GPT-3.5 Turbo OpenAI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 5.5 | 5.5 | |
| Coding | — | 10.7 | |
| Math | 49.3 | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.50 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $1.50 | |
| Context window | Best: 131K | 4K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No |
Intelligence
- Ling-mini-2.0
- 5.5
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 5.5
Coding
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 10.7
Math
- Ling-mini-2.0
- 49.3
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
- $0.50
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
- $1.50
Context window
- Ling-mini-2.0
- Best: 131K
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
- 4K
Reasoning
- Ling-mini-2.0
- No
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
- No
Open weights
- Ling-mini-2.0
- Yes
- GPT-3.5 Turbo
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- GPT-3.5 Turbo5.5 · $0.75
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Ling-mini-2.0.