Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling 3.1 Flash InclusionAI | Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 41.1 | Best: 41.8 | |
| Coding | — | 74.3 | |
| Agentic | — | 41.9 | |
| Speed | 211 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 1.91 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.30 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.90 | — | |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | — | |
| Cost / task | $1.0 | — |
Intelligence
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- 41.1
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- Best: 41.8
Coding
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- —
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- 74.3
Agentic
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- —
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- 41.9
Speed
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- 211 t/s
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
TTFT
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- 1.91 s
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- $0.30
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- $0.90
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Context window
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- 1M
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- 1M
Reasoning
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- Yes
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- Yes
Open weights
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- No
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Cost / task
- Ling 3.1 Flash
- $1.0
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Ling 3.1 Flash41.1 · $1.0
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch).