Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Ling 3.1 Flash InclusionAI	Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) Anthropic
Intelligence	Best: 41.1	40.7
Coding	—	73.6
Agentic	—	38.6
Speed	Best: 211 t/s	52.9 t/s
TTFT	Best: 1.91 s	19.7 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.30	$5×16.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.90	$25×27.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	$1.0	—

Intelligence

Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 41.1
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 40.7

Coding

Ling 3.1 Flash: —
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 73.6

Agentic

Ling 3.1 Flash: —
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 38.6

Speed

Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 211 t/s
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 52.9 t/s

TTFT

Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 1.91 s
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 19.7 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: $0.30
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): $5×16.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: $0.90
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): $25×27.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Ling 3.1 Flash: 1M
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 1M

Reasoning

Ling 3.1 Flash: Yes
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): Yes

Open weights

Ling 3.1 Flash: No
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): No

Cost / task

Ling 3.1 Flash: $1.0
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Ling 3.1 Flash41.1 · $0.45
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)40.7 · $10