Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin
InclusionAI
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Ling-3.0-flash-Fin InclusionAI	Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic
Intelligence	22.6	Best: 22.8
Coding	55.6	—
Agentic	27.9	—
Speed	383 t/s	—
TTFT	1.43 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.075	$15×200 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.22	$75×341 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	262K	Best: 1M
Reasoning	Yes	No
Open weights	Yes	No

Intelligence

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin: 22.6
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): Best: 22.8

Coding

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin: 55.6
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Agentic

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin: 27.9
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Speed

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin: 383 t/s
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

TTFT

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin: 1.43 s
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin: Best: $0.075
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): $15×200 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin: Best: $0.22
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): $75×341 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin: 262K
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): Best: 1M

Reasoning

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin: Yes
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): No

Open weights

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin: Yes
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning): No

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Ling-3.0-flash-Fin22.6 · $0.111
Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)22.8 · $30