Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling-2.6-1T
InclusionAI
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
StepFun
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling-2.6-1T InclusionAI | Step 3.5 Flash 2603 StepFun | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 17 | 17 | |
| Speed | — | 142 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 3.33 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.10 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.30 | |
| Context window | Best: 262K | 256K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Ling-2.6-1T
- 17
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 17
Speed
- Ling-2.6-1T
- —
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 142 t/s
TTFT
- Ling-2.6-1T
- —
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 3.33 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-2.6-1T
- $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Best: $0.10
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-2.6-1T
- $2.50×8.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Best: $0.30
Context window
- Ling-2.6-1T
- Best: 262K
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- 256K
Reasoning
- Ling-2.6-1T
- No
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Yes
Open weights
- Ling-2.6-1T
- Yes
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Ling-2.6-1T17 · $0.85
- Step 3.5 Flash 260317 · $0.15