Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling-2.6-1T
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling-2.6-1T InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 17 | 16.7 | |
| Coding | — | 39.3 | |
| Agentic | — | 2.9 | |
| Speed | — | 65.1 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 0.97 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.10 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $2.50×6.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.40 | |
| Context window | Best: 262K | 256K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Ling-2.6-1T
- Best: 17
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 16.7
Coding
- Ling-2.6-1T
- —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 39.3
Agentic
- Ling-2.6-1T
- —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 2.9
Speed
- Ling-2.6-1T
- —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 65.1 t/s
TTFT
- Ling-2.6-1T
- —
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 0.97 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-2.6-1T
- $0.30×3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Best: $0.10
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Ling-2.6-1T
- $2.50×6.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Best: $0.40
Context window
- Ling-2.6-1T
- Best: 262K
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- 256K
Reasoning
- Ling-2.6-1T
- No
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Yes
Open weights
- Ling-2.6-1T
- Yes
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Ling-2.6-1T17 · $0.85
- Gemma 4 26B A4B (Reasoning)16.7 · $0.175