Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)
Moonshot AI
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning) Moonshot AI	Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning) Anthropic
Intelligence	23.6	Best: 23.7
Math	—	62.7
Speed	45.5 t/s	Best: 46.1 t/s
TTFT	2.78 s	Best: 1.18 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $0.95	$5×5.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $4	$25×6.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	Best: 256K	200K
Reasoning	No	No
Open weights	Yes	No

Intelligence

Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning): 23.6
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): Best: 23.7

Math

Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning): —
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): 62.7

Speed

Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning): 45.5 t/s
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): Best: 46.1 t/s

TTFT

Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning): 2.78 s
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): Best: 1.18 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning): Best: $0.95
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): $5×5.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning): Best: $4
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): $25×6.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning): Best: 256K
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): 200K

Reasoning

Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning): No
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): No

Open weights

Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning): Yes
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning): No

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Kimi K2.6 (Non-reasoning)23.6 · $1.71
Claude Opus 4.5 (Non-reasoning)23.7 · $10