Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
Moonshot AI
- K-EXAONE 2.0
LG AI Research
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning) Moonshot AI | K-EXAONE 2.0 LG AI Research | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 19.4 | Best: 19.7 | |
| Coding | — | 40.6 | |
| Speed | 50.2 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 2.19 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.60 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $3 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 262K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
- 19.4
- K-EXAONE 2.0
- Best: 19.7
Coding
- Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
- —
- K-EXAONE 2.0
- 40.6
Speed
- Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
- 50.2 t/s
- K-EXAONE 2.0
- —
TTFT
- Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
- 2.19 s
- K-EXAONE 2.0
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
- $0.60
- K-EXAONE 2.0
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
- $3
- K-EXAONE 2.0
- —
Context window
- Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 1M
- K-EXAONE 2.0
- 262K
Reasoning
- Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
- No
- K-EXAONE 2.0
- Yes
Open weights
- Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)
- Yes
- K-EXAONE 2.0
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Kimi K2.5 (Non-reasoning)19.4 · $1.20
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: K-EXAONE 2.0.