Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Kimi K2
Moonshot AI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Kimi K2 Moonshot AI | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 12.7 | 12.7 | |
| Coding | — | 22.1 | |
| Math | 57 | — | |
| Agentic | — | 1.3 | |
| Speed | 54.8 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 1.58 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.57×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | Best: $0.45 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $2.30 | $3.50×1.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 128K | 128K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- Kimi K2
- 12.7
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- 12.7
Coding
- Kimi K2
- —
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- 22.1
Math
- Kimi K2
- 57
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- —
Agentic
- Kimi K2
- —
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- 1.3
Speed
- Kimi K2
- 54.8 t/s
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- —
TTFT
- Kimi K2
- 1.58 s
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Kimi K2
- $0.57×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- Best: $0.45
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Kimi K2
- Best: $2.30
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- $3.50×1.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- Kimi K2
- 128K
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- 128K
Reasoning
- Kimi K2
- No
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- Yes
Open weights
- Kimi K2
- Yes
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Kimi K212.7 · $1.00
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 250712.7 · $1.21