Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
LG AI Research
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)
Z.AI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) LG AI Research	GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning) Z.AI
Intelligence	11.2	11.2
Math	44	Best: 44.3
Speed	—	35.4 t/s
TTFT	—	5.16 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	—	$0.575
Output · $ / 1M tokens	—	$2.20
Context window	256K	Best: 1M
Reasoning	No	No
Open weights	Yes	Yes

Intelligence

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning): 11.2
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): 11.2

Math

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning): 44
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): Best: 44.3

Speed

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning): —
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): 35.4 t/s

TTFT

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning): —
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): 5.16 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning): —
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): $0.575

Output · $ / 1M tokens

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning): —
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): $2.20

Context window

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning): 256K
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): Best: 1M

Reasoning

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning): No
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): No

Open weights

K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning): Yes
GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning): Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

GLM-4.6 (Non-reasoning)11.2 · $0.981

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning).