Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
LG AI Research
- GLM-4.5-Air
Z.AI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning) LG AI Research | GLM-4.5-Air Z.AI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 11.2 | 11.1 | |
| Math | 44 | Best: 80.7 | |
| Speed | — | 73.7 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 2.42 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.17 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $0.98 | |
| Context window | Best: 2.02M | 128K | |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 11.2
- GLM-4.5-Air
- 11.1
Math
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
- 44
- GLM-4.5-Air
- Best: 80.7
Speed
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
- —
- GLM-4.5-Air
- 73.7 t/s
TTFT
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
- —
- GLM-4.5-Air
- 2.42 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
- —
- GLM-4.5-Air
- $0.17
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
- —
- GLM-4.5-Air
- $0.98
Context window
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
- Best: 2.02M
- GLM-4.5-Air
- 128K
Reasoning
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
- No
- GLM-4.5-Air
- Yes
Open weights
- K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning)
- Yes
- GLM-4.5-Air
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- GLM-4.5-Air11.1 · $0.372
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: K-EXAONE (Non-reasoning).