Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- JT-35B-Flash
China Mobile
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | JT-35B-Flash China Mobile | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 18.7 | 18.6 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | — | $15 | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | — | $75 | |
| Context window | Best: 256K | 200K | |
| Reasoning | No | No | |
| Open weights | No | No |
Intelligence
- JT-35B-Flash
- Best: 18.7
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 18.6
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- JT-35B-Flash
- —
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $15
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- JT-35B-Flash
- —
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $75
Context window
- JT-35B-Flash
- Best: 256K
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 200K
Reasoning
- JT-35B-Flash
- No
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Open weights
- JT-35B-Flash
- No
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)18.6 · $30
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: JT-35B-Flash.