Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b)
Multiverse Computing
MiniMax M1 80k
MiniMax

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b) Multiverse Computing	MiniMax M1 80k MiniMax
Intelligence	11.7	11.7
Coding	23.2	—
Math	—	61
Agentic	0.9	—
Speed	—	67.4 t/s
TTFT	—	1.74 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	—	$0.55
Output · $ / 1M tokens	—	$2.20
Context window	131K	Best: 1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	Yes	Yes

Intelligence

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b): 11.7
MiniMax M1 80k: 11.7

Coding

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b): 23.2
MiniMax M1 80k: —

Math

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b): —
MiniMax M1 80k: 61

Agentic

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b): 0.9
MiniMax M1 80k: —

Speed

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b): —
MiniMax M1 80k: 67.4 t/s

TTFT

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b): —
MiniMax M1 80k: 1.74 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b): —
MiniMax M1 80k: $0.55

Output · $ / 1M tokens

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b): —
MiniMax M1 80k: $2.20

Context window

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b): 131K
MiniMax M1 80k: Best: 1M

Reasoning

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b): Yes
MiniMax M1 80k: Yes

Open weights

HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b): Yes
MiniMax M1 80k: Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

MiniMax M1 80k11.7 · $0.963

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: HyperNova 60B 2605 (High, Based on gpt-oss-120b).