Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Grok 4.6 (Medium)
SpaceXSI
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Grok 4.6 (Medium) SpaceXSI	Ling 3.1 Flash InclusionAI
Intelligence	Best: 42.8	41.1
Coding	74.4	—
Agentic	50.6	—
Speed	64.1 t/s	Best: 212 t/s
TTFT	32.2 s	Best: 1.84 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$2×6.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$6×6.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.90
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes
Cost / task	$1.14×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $1.01

Intelligence

Grok 4.6 (Medium): Best: 42.8
Ling 3.1 Flash: 41.1

Coding

Grok 4.6 (Medium): 74.4
Ling 3.1 Flash: —

Agentic

Grok 4.6 (Medium): 50.6
Ling 3.1 Flash: —

Speed

Grok 4.6 (Medium): 64.1 t/s
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 212 t/s

TTFT

Grok 4.6 (Medium): 32.2 s
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 1.84 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Grok 4.6 (Medium): $2×6.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: $0.30

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Grok 4.6 (Medium): $6×6.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: $0.90

Context window

Grok 4.6 (Medium): 1M
Ling 3.1 Flash: 1M

Reasoning

Grok 4.6 (Medium): Yes
Ling 3.1 Flash: Yes

Open weights

Grok 4.6 (Medium): No
Ling 3.1 Flash: Yes

Cost / task

Grok 4.6 (Medium): $1.14×1.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: $1.01

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Grok 4.6 (Medium)42.8 · $1.14
Ling 3.1 Flash41.1 · $1.01