Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
Ibm Granite
- Gemma 3 270M
Google
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro Ibm Granite | Gemma 3 270M | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 5.1 | 5.1 | |
| Math | — | 2.3 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.017 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.112 | — | |
| Context window | 131K | Best: 270M | |
| Reasoning | — | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- 5.1
- Gemma 3 270M
- 5.1
Math
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- —
- Gemma 3 270M
- 2.3
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- $0.017
- Gemma 3 270M
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- $0.112
- Gemma 3 270M
- —
Context window
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- 131K
- Gemma 3 270M
- Best: 270M
Reasoning
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- —
- Gemma 3 270M
- No
Open weights
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- Yes
- Gemma 3 270M
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro5.1 · $0.0408
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemma 3 270M.