Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
Ibm Granite
- Apertus 70B Instruct
Swiss AI Initiative
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro Ibm Granite | Apertus 70B Instruct Swiss AI Initiative | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 5.1 | 5.1 | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.017 | $0.82×48.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $0.112 | $2.92×26.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | Best: 131K | 66K | |
| Reasoning | — | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes |
Intelligence
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- 5.1
- Apertus 70B Instruct
- 5.1
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- Best: $0.017
- Apertus 70B Instruct
- $0.82×48.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- Best: $0.112
- Apertus 70B Instruct
- $2.92×26.1 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- Best: 131K
- Apertus 70B Instruct
- 66K
Reasoning
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- —
- Apertus 70B Instruct
- No
Open weights
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro
- Yes
- Apertus 70B Instruct
- Yes
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- IBM: Granite 4.0 Micro5.1 · $0.0408
- Apertus 70B Instruct5.1 · $1.35