Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling 3.0 Tiny InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 11.1 | 11.1 | |
| Coding | 22.4 | Best: 26.5 | |
| Agentic | 1.3 | Best: 4.4 | |
| Speed | Best: 120 t/s | 16.2 t/s | |
| TTFT | Best: 0.77 s | 31.6 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.060 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.25 | — | |
| Context window | 131K | Best: 262K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | $0.0236 | Best: $0 |
Intelligence
- Granite 4.2 8B
- 11.1
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
- 11.1
Coding
- Granite 4.2 8B
- 22.4
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
- Best: 26.5
Agentic
- Granite 4.2 8B
- 1.3
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
- Best: 4.4
Speed
- Granite 4.2 8B
- Best: 120 t/s
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
- 16.2 t/s
TTFT
- Granite 4.2 8B
- Best: 0.77 s
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
- 31.6 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Granite 4.2 8B
- $0.060
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Granite 4.2 8B
- $0.25
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
- —
Context window
- Granite 4.2 8B
- 131K
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
- Best: 262K
Reasoning
- Granite 4.2 8B
- Yes
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
- Yes
Open weights
- Granite 4.2 8B
- Yes
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
- Yes
Cost / task
- Granite 4.2 8B
- $0.0236
- Ling 3.0 Tiny
- Best: $0
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Granite 4.2 8B11.1 · $0.0236
- Ling 3.0 Tiny11.1 · $0