Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling-1T
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling-1T InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 9.1 | Best: 9.2 | |
| Coding | 17.5 | — | |
| Math | — | 71.3 | |
| Agentic | 0.9 | — | |
| Speed | 223 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 0.5 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.030 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.12 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 131K | 128K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | $0.0060 | — |
Intelligence
- Granite 4.2 3B
- 9.1
- Ling-1T
- Best: 9.2
Coding
- Granite 4.2 3B
- 17.5
- Ling-1T
- —
Math
- Granite 4.2 3B
- —
- Ling-1T
- 71.3
Agentic
- Granite 4.2 3B
- 0.9
- Ling-1T
- —
Speed
- Granite 4.2 3B
- 223 t/s
- Ling-1T
- —
TTFT
- Granite 4.2 3B
- 0.5 s
- Ling-1T
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Granite 4.2 3B
- $0.030
- Ling-1T
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Granite 4.2 3B
- $0.12
- Ling-1T
- —
Context window
- Granite 4.2 3B
- Best: 131K
- Ling-1T
- 128K
Reasoning
- Granite 4.2 3B
- Yes
- Ling-1T
- No
Open weights
- Granite 4.2 3B
- Yes
- Ling-1T
- Yes
Cost / task
- Granite 4.2 3B
- $0.0060
- Ling-1T
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Granite 4.2 3B9.1 · $0.0060
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Ling-1T.