Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- Ling-mini-2.0
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | Ling-mini-2.0 InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 5.5 | 5.5 | |
| Coding | 29.9 | — | |
| Math | — | 49.3 | |
| Agentic | 3.5 | — | |
| Speed | 41.4 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 0.97 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.16 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.65 | — | |
| Context window | 131K | 131K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | Yes | |
| Cost / task | $0.0717 | — |
Intelligence
- Granite 4.2 30B
- 5.5
- Ling-mini-2.0
- 5.5
Coding
- Granite 4.2 30B
- 29.9
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
Math
- Granite 4.2 30B
- —
- Ling-mini-2.0
- 49.3
Agentic
- Granite 4.2 30B
- 3.5
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
Speed
- Granite 4.2 30B
- 41.4 t/s
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
TTFT
- Granite 4.2 30B
- 0.97 s
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- Granite 4.2 30B
- $0.16
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- Granite 4.2 30B
- $0.65
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
Context window
- Granite 4.2 30B
- 131K
- Ling-mini-2.0
- 131K
Reasoning
- Granite 4.2 30B
- Yes
- Ling-mini-2.0
- No
Open weights
- Granite 4.2 30B
- Yes
- Ling-mini-2.0
- Yes
Cost / task
- Granite 4.2 30B
- $0.0717
- Ling-mini-2.0
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- Granite 4.2 30B5.5 · $0.0717
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Ling-mini-2.0.