Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

Granite 4.1 8B
IBM
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24)
Google

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	Granite 4.1 8B IBM	Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24) Google
Intelligence	6.6	6.6
Coding	9.5	—
Speed	126 t/s	—
TTFT	0.75 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$0.050	—
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$0.10	—
Context window	131K	Best: 2M
Reasoning	No	Yes
Open weights	Yes	No

Intelligence

Granite 4.1 8B: 6.6
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24): 6.6

Coding

Granite 4.1 8B: 9.5
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24): —

Speed

Granite 4.1 8B: 126 t/s
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24): —

TTFT

Granite 4.1 8B: 0.75 s
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

Granite 4.1 8B: $0.050
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24): —

Output · $ / 1M tokens

Granite 4.1 8B: $0.10
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24): —

Context window

Granite 4.1 8B: 131K
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24): Best: 2M

Reasoning

Granite 4.1 8B: No
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24): Yes

Open weights

Granite 4.1 8B: Yes
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24): No

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

Granite 4.1 8B6.6 · $0.063

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental (Dec '24).