Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

GPT-6 Sol (Low)
OpenAI
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning)
China Mobile

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	GPT-6 Sol (Low) OpenAI	JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning) China Mobile
Intelligence	Best: 34.2	33.9
Coding	—	52.4
Speed	85.7 t/s	—
TTFT	1.9 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$2	—
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$10	—
Context window	Best: 1.1M	262K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	$0.133	—

Intelligence

GPT-6 Sol (Low): Best: 34.2
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): 33.9

Coding

GPT-6 Sol (Low): —
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): 52.4

Speed

GPT-6 Sol (Low): 85.7 t/s
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

TTFT

GPT-6 Sol (Low): 1.9 s
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol (Low): $2
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Output · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-6 Sol (Low): $10
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Context window

GPT-6 Sol (Low): Best: 1.1M
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): 262K

Reasoning

GPT-6 Sol (Low): Yes
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): Yes

Open weights

GPT-6 Sol (Low): No
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): No

Cost / task

GPT-6 Sol (Low): $0.133
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

GPT-6 Sol (Low)34.2 · $0.133

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning).