Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)
OpenAI
- Ling 2.6 Flash
InclusionAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | GPT-6 Luna (Low) OpenAI | Ling 2.6 Flash InclusionAI | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 9.7 | 9.7 | |
| Coding | — | 25.3 | |
| Speed | 113 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 2.56 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.10 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.50 | — | |
| Context window | Best: 1M | 262K | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | No | Yes | |
| Cost / task | $0.0051 | — |
Intelligence
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)
- 9.7
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- 9.7
Coding
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)
- —
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- 25.3
Speed
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)
- 113 t/s
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- —
TTFT
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)
- 2.56 s
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)
- $0.10
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)
- $0.50
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- —
Context window
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)
- Best: 1M
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- 262K
Reasoning
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)
- Yes
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- No
Open weights
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)
- No
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- Yes
Cost / task
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)
- $0.0051
- Ling 2.6 Flash
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- GPT-6 Luna (Low)9.7 · $0.0051
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Ling 2.6 Flash.