Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

GPT-6.1 Terra (High)
OpenAI
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)
Anthropic

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	GPT-6.1 Terra (High) OpenAI	Claude Opus 4.7 (Max) Anthropic
Intelligence	Best: 42.4	40.7
Coding	—	73.6
Agentic	—	38.6
Speed	Best: 84.6 t/s	48.1 t/s
TTFT	Best: 18.4 s	27.9 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $1	$5×5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens	Best: $5	$25×5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	$0.259	—

Intelligence

GPT-6.1 Terra (High): Best: 42.4
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 40.7

Coding

GPT-6.1 Terra (High): —
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 73.6

Agentic

GPT-6.1 Terra (High): —
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 38.6

Speed

GPT-6.1 Terra (High): Best: 84.6 t/s
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 48.1 t/s

TTFT

GPT-6.1 Terra (High): Best: 18.4 s
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 27.9 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra (High): Best: $1
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): $5×5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Output · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-6.1 Terra (High): Best: $5
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): $25×5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Context window

GPT-6.1 Terra (High): 1M
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): 1M

Reasoning

GPT-6.1 Terra (High): Yes
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): Yes

Open weights

GPT-6.1 Terra (High): No
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): No

Cost / task

GPT-6.1 Terra (High): $0.259
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

GPT-6.1 Terra (High)42.4 · $2
Claude Opus 4.7 (Max)40.7 · $10