Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
OpenAI
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | GPT-6.1 Sol (Low) OpenAI | Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 42.1 | 41.8 | |
| Coding | — | 74.3 | |
| Agentic | — | 41.9 | |
| Speed | 44.2 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 3.16 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $2 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $10 | — | |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | No | — | |
| Cost / task | $0.131 | — |
Intelligence
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
- Best: 42.1
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- 41.8
Coding
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
- —
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- 74.3
Agentic
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
- —
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- 41.9
Speed
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
- 44.2 t/s
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
TTFT
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
- 3.16 s
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
- $2
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
- $10
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Context window
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
- 1M
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- 1M
Reasoning
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
- Yes
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- Yes
Open weights
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
- No
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Cost / task
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)
- $0.131
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Low)42.1 · $0.131
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch).