Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

GPT-5.6 Terra (High)
OpenAI
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning)
China Mobile

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	GPT-5.6 Terra (High) OpenAI	JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning) China Mobile
Intelligence	Best: 34.2	33.9
Coding	Best: 67.1	52.4
Agentic	36.7	—
Speed	92.9 t/s	—
TTFT	10.9 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$2	—
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$12	—
Context window	Best: 1M	262K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	$0.338	—

Intelligence

GPT-5.6 Terra (High): Best: 34.2
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): 33.9

Coding

GPT-5.6 Terra (High): Best: 67.1
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): 52.4

Agentic

GPT-5.6 Terra (High): 36.7
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Speed

GPT-5.6 Terra (High): 92.9 t/s
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

TTFT

GPT-5.6 Terra (High): 10.9 s
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-5.6 Terra (High): $2
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Output · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-5.6 Terra (High): $12
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Context window

GPT-5.6 Terra (High): Best: 1M
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): 262K

Reasoning

GPT-5.6 Terra (High): Yes
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): Yes

Open weights

GPT-5.6 Terra (High): No
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): No

Cost / task

GPT-5.6 Terra (High): $0.338
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

GPT-5.6 Terra (High)34.2 · $0.338

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning).