Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

GPT-5.6 Sol (High)
OpenAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	GPT-5.6 Sol (High) OpenAI	Ling 3.1 Flash InclusionAI
Intelligence	Best: 42.3	41.1
Coding	77.2	—
Agentic	44.2	—
Speed	111 t/s	Best: 212 t/s
TTFT	11.7 s	Best: 1.84 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$4×13.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.30
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$20×22.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.90
Context window	1M	1M
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes
Cost / task	Best: $0.808	$1.01×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Intelligence

GPT-5.6 Sol (High): Best: 42.3
Ling 3.1 Flash: 41.1

Coding

GPT-5.6 Sol (High): 77.2
Ling 3.1 Flash: —

Agentic

GPT-5.6 Sol (High): 44.2
Ling 3.1 Flash: —

Speed

GPT-5.6 Sol (High): 111 t/s
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 212 t/s

TTFT

GPT-5.6 Sol (High): 11.7 s
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: 1.84 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol (High): $4×13.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: $0.30

Output · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-5.6 Sol (High): $20×22.2 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling 3.1 Flash: Best: $0.90

Context window

GPT-5.6 Sol (High): 1M
Ling 3.1 Flash: 1M

Reasoning

GPT-5.6 Sol (High): Yes
Ling 3.1 Flash: Yes

Open weights

GPT-5.6 Sol (High): No
Ling 3.1 Flash: Yes

Cost / task

GPT-5.6 Sol (High): Best: $0.808
Ling 3.1 Flash: $1.01×1.3 relative to the lowest price among the compared models

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

GPT-5.6 Sol (High)42.3 · $0.808
Ling 3.1 Flash41.1 · $1.01