Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

GPT-5.5 (Medium)
OpenAI
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning)
China Mobile

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	GPT-5.5 (Medium) OpenAI	JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning) China Mobile
Intelligence	33.8	Best: 33.9
Coding	Best: 71.5	52.4
Agentic	29.5	—
Speed	81.8 t/s	—
TTFT	7.87 s	—
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$5	—
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$30	—
Context window	Best: 922K	262K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	No
Cost / task	$0.902	—

Intelligence

GPT-5.5 (Medium): 33.8
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): Best: 33.9

Coding

GPT-5.5 (Medium): Best: 71.5
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): 52.4

Agentic

GPT-5.5 (Medium): 29.5
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Speed

GPT-5.5 (Medium): 81.8 t/s
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

TTFT

GPT-5.5 (Medium): 7.87 s
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Input · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-5.5 (Medium): $5
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Output · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-5.5 (Medium): $30
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Context window

GPT-5.5 (Medium): Best: 922K
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): 262K

Reasoning

GPT-5.5 (Medium): Yes
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): Yes

Open weights

GPT-5.5 (Medium): No
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): No

Cost / task

GPT-5.5 (Medium): $0.902
JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning): —

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

GPT-5.5 (Medium)33.8 · $0.902

Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: JT-4.1 Flash 236B A21B (Reasoning).