Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- GPT-5.2 (Medium)
OpenAI
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | GPT-5.2 (Medium) OpenAI | Add a model · 2/4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 26.5 | 26.4 | |
| Math | 96.7 | — | |
| Speed | — | 37.8 t/s | |
| TTFT | — | 2.13 s | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $1.75 | $5×2.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $14 | $25×1.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 400K | Best: 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | No | No |
Intelligence
- GPT-5.2 (Medium)
- Best: 26.5
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 26.4
Math
- GPT-5.2 (Medium)
- 96.7
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- —
Speed
- GPT-5.2 (Medium)
- —
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 37.8 t/s
TTFT
- GPT-5.2 (Medium)
- —
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- 2.13 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- GPT-5.2 (Medium)
- Best: $1.75
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- $5×2.9 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- GPT-5.2 (Medium)
- Best: $14
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- $25×1.8 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- GPT-5.2 (Medium)
- 400K
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- Best: 1M
Reasoning
- GPT-5.2 (Medium)
- Yes
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- No
Open weights
- GPT-5.2 (Medium)
- No
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)
- No
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- GPT-5.2 (Medium)26.5 · $4.81
- Claude Opus 4.6 (Non-reasoning, High)26.4 · $10