Model Comparator

Compare up to four models using the same criteria.

GPT-5.1 (High)
OpenAI
Ling-3.0-flash-VL
InclusionAI

Differences only

✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.

Model Comparator
Metrics	GPT-5.1 (High) OpenAI	Ling-3.0-flash-VL InclusionAI
Intelligence	Best: 24.7	24.6
Coding	49.4	Best: 57
Math	94	—
Agentic	—	28.7
Speed	112 t/s	Best: 124 t/s
TTFT	27.3 s	Best: 2.13 s
Input · $ / 1M tokens	$1.25×16.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.075
Output · $ / 1M tokens	$10×45.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models	Best: $0.22
Context window	Best: 400K	262K
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Open weights	No	Yes

Intelligence

GPT-5.1 (High): Best: 24.7
Ling-3.0-flash-VL: 24.6

Coding

GPT-5.1 (High): 49.4
Ling-3.0-flash-VL: Best: 57

Math

GPT-5.1 (High): 94
Ling-3.0-flash-VL: —

Agentic

GPT-5.1 (High): —
Ling-3.0-flash-VL: 28.7

Speed

GPT-5.1 (High): 112 t/s
Ling-3.0-flash-VL: Best: 124 t/s

TTFT

GPT-5.1 (High): 27.3 s
Ling-3.0-flash-VL: Best: 2.13 s

Input · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-5.1 (High): $1.25×16.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling-3.0-flash-VL: Best: $0.075

Output · $ / 1M tokens

GPT-5.1 (High): $10×45.5 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Ling-3.0-flash-VL: Best: $0.22

Context window

GPT-5.1 (High): Best: 400K
Ling-3.0-flash-VL: 262K

Reasoning

GPT-5.1 (High): Yes
Ling-3.0-flash-VL: Yes

Open weights

GPT-5.1 (High): No
Ling-3.0-flash-VL: Yes

Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.

Score and cost

Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.

GPT-5.1 (High)24.7 · $3.44
Ling-3.0-flash-VL24.6 · $0.111