Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- GLM-5.3 (Low)
Z.AI
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | GLM-5.3 (Low) Z.AI | Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning) Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | Best: 23.1 | 22.8 | |
| Speed | 77.1 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 1.72 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $1.40 | $15×10.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | Best: $4.40 | $75×17 relative to the lowest price among the compared models | |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | |
| Open weights | Yes | No | |
| Cost / task | $1.57 | — |
Intelligence
- GLM-5.3 (Low)
- Best: 23.1
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 22.8
Speed
- GLM-5.3 (Low)
- 77.1 t/s
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
TTFT
- GLM-5.3 (Low)
- 1.72 s
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- GLM-5.3 (Low)
- Best: $1.40
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $15×10.7 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- GLM-5.3 (Low)
- Best: $4.40
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- $75×17 relative to the lowest price among the compared models
Context window
- GLM-5.3 (Low)
- 1M
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- 1M
Reasoning
- GLM-5.3 (Low)
- Yes
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Open weights
- GLM-5.3 (Low)
- Yes
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- No
Cost / task
- GLM-5.3 (Low)
- $1.57
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- GLM-5.3 (Low)23.1 · $2.15
- Claude 4.1 Opus (Non-reasoning)22.8 · $30