Model Comparator
Compare up to four models using the same criteria.
2 models compared
- GLM-5.3-Flash
Z.AI
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
Anthropic
✓ Best published value among measured models. — Data unavailable. These metrics do not establish an overall ranking.
| Metrics | GLM-5.3-Flash Z.AI | Claude Opus 4.8 (batch) Anthropic | Add a model · 2/4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence | 41.8 | 41.8 | |
| Coding | 71.5 | Best: 74.3 | |
| Agentic | Best: 50.9 | 41.9 | |
| Cyber Index | 49.9% | — | |
| Speed | 64.5 t/s | — | |
| TTFT | 2.74 s | — | |
| Input · $ / 1M tokens | $0.15 | — | |
| Output · $ / 1M tokens | $0.50 | — | |
| Context window | 1M | 1M | |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | |
| Open weights | Yes | — | |
| Cost / task | $0.284 | — |
Intelligence
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- 41.8
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- 41.8
Coding
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- 71.5
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- Best: 74.3
Agentic
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- Best: 50.9
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- 41.9
Cyber Index
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- 49.9%
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Speed
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- 64.5 t/s
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
TTFT
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- 2.74 s
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Input · $ / 1M tokens
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- $0.15
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Output · $ / 1M tokens
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- $0.50
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Context window
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- 1M
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- 1M
Reasoning
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- Yes
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- Yes
Open weights
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- Yes
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Cost / task
- GLM-5.3-Flash
- $0.284
- Claude Opus 4.8 (batch)
- —
Each reasoning level remains a separate configuration.
Score and cost
Each line joins the reasoning levels of a compared model; the large point marks the configuration in the table. The top-right corner holds the best score for the lowest cost. Select another point to compare that level.
- GLM-5.3-Flash41.8 · $0.284
Not plotted for lack of data on these axes: Claude Opus 4.8 (batch).